Collaborating With Service Users to Select Psychiatry Residents Committed to Health Equity and Social Justice.

PROBLEM: Advocates have called for health services to be delivered equitably to all. Academic psychiatry must play a role in this work, given its history of creating and perpetuating the marginalization of people experiencing mental health issues. While medical educators have started teaching concepts such as structural competency and cultural safety, careful consideration of who enters the medical workforce and what values they bring is also important. APPROACH: The authors report on the first 5 years (2016-2021) of a collaboration with individuals who have used mental health or addiction services or identify as having lived experiences of mental health and/or substance use issues (i.e., service users) to select residents to the general adult psychiatry residency program at the University of Toronto who are committed to working toward health equity and social justice and who bring diverse personal, academic, and community-based experiences. Starting in 2016, a working group of service users and faculty iteratively refined the selection process to add personal letter and interview day writing sample prompts centered on social justice and advocacy. OUTCOMES: The working group, coled by service users since 2019, defined the problem (lack of attention to health equity and social justice in resident selection) and codesigned the solution by revising writing prompts used in the selection process and their assessment rubrics to emphasize these missing areas. Further, service users directly participated in the implementation by reviewing candidates' personal letters and interview day writing samples alongside faculty and residents. This work serves as an example of meaningful service user engagement in action. NEXT STEPS: To ensure the needs of service users are prioritized, future work must aim for long-term institutional commitment to strengthen service user involvement and power sharing with service user communities in resident selection and at other points along the medical education pathway.

Disturbed sleep is associated with reduced verbal episodic memory and entorhinal cortex volume in younger middle-aged women with risk-reducing early ovarian removal.

Introduction: Women with early ovarian removal (<48 years) have an elevated risk for both late-life Alzheimer's disease (AD) and insomnia, a modifiable risk factor. In early midlife, they also show reduced verbal episodic memory and hippocampal volume. Whether these reductions correlate with a sleep phenotype consistent with insomnia risk remains unexplored. Methods: We recruited thirty-one younger middleaged women with risk-reducing early bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), fifteen of whom were taking estradiol-based hormone replacement therapy (BSO+ERT) and sixteen who were not (BSO). Fourteen age-matched premenopausal (AMC) and seventeen spontaneously peri-postmenopausal (SM) women who were ~10y older and not taking ERT were also enrolled. Overnight polysomnography recordings were collected at participants' home across multiple nights (M=2.38 SEM=0.19), along with subjective sleep quality and hot flash ratings. In addition to group comparisons on sleep measures, associations with verbal episodic memory and medial temporal lobe volume were assessed. Results: Increased sleep latency and decreased sleep efficiency were observed on polysomnography recordings of those not taking ERT, consistent with insomnia symptoms. This phenotype was also observed in the older women in SM, implicating ovarian hormone loss. Further, sleep latency was associated with more forgetting on the paragraph recall task, previously shown to be altered in women with early BSO. Both increased sleep latency and reduced sleep efficiency were associated with smaller anterolateral entorhinal cortex volume. Discussion: Together, these findings confirm an association between ovarian hormone loss and insomnia symptoms, and importantly, identify an younger onset age in women with early ovarian removal, which may contribute to poorer cognitive and brain outcomes in these women.

A trauma-informed approach to suicide prevention for the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers have questioned how the devastation of the pandemic might impact suicide rates. While initial evidence on suicide rates during the early stages of the pandemic is mixed, there are signs we should still remain vigilant. One way of conceptualizing the long-term effects of the pandemic is as a source of multiple traumatic events: the collective trauma of widespread illness and death and social upheaval, individual traumas from the virus itself (e.g., serious illness and disability, traumatic grief, vicarious trauma), traumas from the social and economic consequences (e.g., domestic violence, unemployment), and its intersections with pre-pandemic traumas and oppression. Given trauma is a well-established risk factor for suicide, this carries significant implications for suicide prevention in the wake of the pandemic. Yet access to trauma-informed care, education, and research remains limited. The pandemic presents a unique opportunity to address these gaps and implement a trauma-informed approach to suicide prevention. Building on existing frameworks, we describe how effective suicide prevention for the pandemic must incorporate trauma-informed and trauma-specific services, strategies, and policies; capacity building; collaborative research; and knowledge exchange. Attending to the traumatic effects of the pandemic may reduce the long-term impact on suicide rates.

Physicians' perspectives on processes for emergency mental health transfers from university health clinics to hospitals in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: In Ontario, Canada, there is variability in how students experiencing a mental health crisis are transferred from university health clinics to hospital for emergent psychiatric assessment, particularly regarding police involvement and physical restraint use. We sought to understand existing processes for these transfers, and barriers to and facilitators of change. METHODS: Between July 2018 and January 2019, we conducted semistructured qualitative interviews by telephone or in person with physicians working at Ontario university health clinics. We developed the interview guide by integrating an extensive literature review, and the expertise of stakeholders and people with lived experience. We analyzed the interview transcripts thematically. Analysis was informed by participant responses to a questionnaire exploring their perspectives about crisis transfer processes. We requested institutional policy and process documents to support analysis and generate a policy summary. RESULTS: Eleven physicians (9 family physicians and 2 psychiatrists) from 9 university health clinics were interviewed. Ten of the 11 completed questionnaires. Policy and process documents were obtained from 5 clinics. There was variation in processes for emergency mental health transfers and in clinicians' experiences with and beliefs about these processes. Police were commonly involved in transfers from 7 of the 11 clinics, and in nearly all or all transfers from 5 of the 11 clinics. Handcuffs were always or almost always used during transfer at 2 clinics. Three major themes were identified: police involvement and restraint use can cause harm; clinical considerations are used to justify police involvement and restraint use; and pragmatic, nonclinical factors often inform transfer practices. INTERPRETATION: The involvement of police and use of restraints in crisis mental health transfers to hospital were related to pragmatic, extramedical factors in some university health clinics in Ontario. Exploring existing variability and the factors that sustain potentially harmful practices can facilitate standard implementation of less invasive and traumatizing transfer processes.